Love Symposium

In the late hours of a Winter Break evening, myself, Brian Smith, Seamus McCulloch, and Adam Liberty all sat around my kitchen table with a few friendly bottles of wine and set out to define what love is.  What is this thing that governs our day-to-day lives so thoroughly?  What is this emotion we feel towards our nearest and dearest, and is it in fact an emotion or is it something entirely different?  We all think we have a sense of what love is, but do we really?  Or is it this entity involved in our human lives that somehow evades definition.  The importance of this discussion is inherent of the supreme importance that the role of love plays in the human life.  As a side note I would like to add that my summary of the discussion may be skewed and/or incomplete due to my own beliefs and plain inability to reconstruct the arguments made in the proper form.  Please let me know if any parties involved feel as if their points were misconstrued or misrepresented.  Feel free to scroll down and preview the bold section titles if you do not want to read the entire discussion, and rather focus on aspects that might interest you particularly.

What is Love?
Aside from being an incredibly catchy (for the first minute) Haddaway song from the 90's, this is a fundamental question to human existence.  We all want to get in touch with ourselves.  Some of us are more willing than others to admit that the search for self identity is a long one, and the most fundamental aspect of self discovery is coming to a conclusion concerning what it means to be a member of the human race.  The human condition is a matter of great debate and difference, but love plays an inarguably large role in the human condition.  In fact, as concluded from our symposium, love is THE essence of humankind.  If one is incapable of expressing love in any form, one is quite surely subhuman or an incredibly maladapted human.  Think of it, being a human without the capacity to care about anything.  Love applies not only to relationships between humans, but to love for a cause (think Martin Luther King Jr.), and love of inanimate objects (symbols, important heirlooms, etc.), as well as any amount of care applied from a human to another thing, be it an idea, another human, an object, whatever one may feel passionate about.  Now certainly I do not mean to say that one's love for a Grandmother's necklace and one's love for his spouse are equal, their are gradients of love involved here, but the same basic concept is there.  Love implies devotion, sacrifice, and ultimately (although some exceptions may apply, discussed later) reciprocation from anything that one may feel compassion towards.  What would the world be, no...what would the human race be without the capacity to feel compassion for things involved in their lives?  To quote some high school sentiments of mine, and I am sure many lyricists and poets, the earth would be a cold, dead place.  Love is the main motivator behind all of our social interactions, and without it, we would not associate with each other.  This leads me to a subtopic of what love is, whether it is an emotion or otherwise.

Is love an emotion?
This is a question I (and when I refer to "I" here, I think I speak for the four of us) believe gets passed over far too readily in any discussion of love.  Sure, it is natural to say that you feel love, and that it effects us emotionally, so therefore it is an emotion.  But, love is more than that.  Love holds far too much weight in our lives to be considered an emotion.  Anger, happiness, melancholy, these are emotions.  Love implies something of much greater influence than any of the aforementioned emotions.  Love is a separate entity that manifests itself within the human spirit (take that term as religiously as you wish, it still applies whether it be divine or secular).  From love, we derive emotions such as happiness, disappointment, satisfaction, and any other myriad feelings.  Love is something larger than emotion because we do not feel love really, love makes us feel.  Our devotion to something or another is what our emotions are derived from.  Love is far more of a controlling factor than unstable emotions that may arise in our lives.

What is required for love?
So then, what are the required components in order for this thing called love to occur?  The mystical approach to love often taken is that nothing is required, that true love just happens and everyone lives happily ever after because of it.  But, when love is discussed in its full extent across all occurrences, it is obvious that there are some basic conditions that need to be met for love to grow from any relationship.  First off, and most obviously perhaps, positive emotions need to be derived from a healthy relationship involving love.  Even the masochist derives joy from his love for pain.  Certainly love for something may also bring with it negative emotions such as regret, melancholy, and disappointment (I will discuss this further in the following section).  But certainly some amount of emotional reward must be received from a loving relationship.  Be it that glimmer of hope one party sees in a situation of unrequited love, or the eternal happiness found in a long lasting relationship between humans or between a man and his cause he believes in, etc.  Sacrifice is also essential to love.  Both (or all) parties must have something to give and to sacrifice in a loving relationship (again, complicated by unrequited love, but I will discuss that later).  Whether it be time, finances, emotions, possessions, etc., something must be sacrificed by both parties.  One must give time to the other in which maybe they would prefer to do something else, but to keep the loving relationship healthy, time must be spent.
So in short, sacrifice, devotion, and reciprocation must be present for a healthy loving relationship to occur.  Another way to look at the structure of components involved in love is that there is a physical side and an emotional side to love.  Both sides must be met somehow or another.  Physical doesn't necessarily imply sex or actual physical contact, but it also implies the baser of human needs like having a good relationship with friends that you get out and play basketball with etc.  These relationships still hold some physical value, although it may be a bit more abstract than a sexually involved relationship.  So what if one of these components is missing from one side?  This brings us to our next question.

Is unrequited love possible?
This is where the relatively simple distinction for what is required for love becomes troublesome.  We have all experience some situation of unrequited love in our lives at sometime or another.  So obviously, this is a possible type of relationship.  But, its standing among other loving relationships and its explanation need to be further investigated.  A situation of unrequited love removes the reciprocation and makes both sacrifice and devotion one-sided when compared to a normal, healthy loving relationship.  This makes unrequited love a loving relationship, but it negatively effects at least one, if not both parties involved.  In a situation of unrequited love between a person and his cause, if he does not reap any rewards from his time devoted and sacrificed to his cause, it can only wear on his emotional state, slowly eroding it in a negative way.  Much is the same in a case between two humans.  If you truly love someone, you will devote time and energy to them, but without reciprocation, this devotion can only lead to harmful wear and tear on your emotional state.  In the case of false reciprocation, or when one side of the relationship is devoting time and energy to the other, and thinks he is receiving reciprocated emotions, this still harms the other party.  No one likes to be relentlessly pursued by someone they do not love, nor does anyone like to spend too much time around people they do not love in the case of friendships.  To illustrate this better, assume that you are being pursued romantically by someone you have no interest in, not even a friendly interest.  Will this subtract from your day?  Will this make you alter your routine to attempt to avoid this person?  Of course it will.  And this process of avoidance will end up wearing on your nerves and your spirit.  The case of unhealthy friendships is much the same.  You all know the situation where someone really thinks they are your friend, but you haven't the slightest interest in the other's company, yet this person endlessly pursues your affection.  This also fosters an unhealthy relationship.  Both parties must benefit in order for a healthy loving relationship to form, but unhealthy loving relationships certainly are possible.  This provides a nice transition in to the discussion of whether or not we can love too many people or spread our love around too much.

Is love limited?
With both healthy and unhealthy relationships being possible, is there a limit to how many we can have?  Do humans contain an inner urn of love from which they can only dole out a certain amount?  In a sense, yes, but we have no limits on how many healthy loving relationships we can have.  The ability for humans to have as many healthy loving relationships as they wish does not mean that all relationships are intrinsically equal.  This simply means that there is no limit to how many loving relationships you can be in.  As long as the relationship is healthy (reciprocation is involved, and needs discussed above are being met, then this does not detract from one's ability to love more people/things, instead it adds because of the happiness you receive from a healthy relationship.  This cycle of developing loving relationships can then be categorized as self-sustaining.  An unhealthy, non-reciprocating relationship however will wear down on one's ability to love because no positive emotions are being extracted from the relationship.  This is the only way in which one is limited in how many unhealthy relationships one can have.  If you don't believe me, take a look at the people you love.  Your parents, your significant other (if there is one), your friends (and by this I mean real friends, not the 12,347 Facebook friends we all have), causes you may be devoted to, whatever it may be, you love a lot of people and things in your life.  Could there really be a limit that hinders your ability to add to that list?  It could be just me, but I get every realm of loving relationships from all of my friendships, emotional, physical (yes, sexual reciprocation from dudes), and any other type of reciprocation I may desire.  All of my (and your, I hope) good friends provide a very high amount of emotional support and structure.  And yes, I even get sexual reciprocation from male friends because, if you are a guy, you know the value of dude time.  You know the important issues that come up during dude time that will not come up at any other time, simply because you need a male to discuss certain things with.  And girls, I am sure there is invaluable meaning to girl time that you would not give up for anything in the world, so in this way, we all receive sexual reciprocation from our good friends.  So our relationships with our significant others and our good friends and our parents, etc. are all fully reciprocating, therefore our ability to continue forming new, loving relationships stays intact.

Is sex required for love between two humans in a romantic relationship?
No. No, no and no.  Sex is such a problematic thing to discuss in the context of love.  There are many fully functional loving relationships that do not involve one second of sex.  Couples that are not yet married that do not believe in sex before marriage, is their love any less complete than a couple that has sex?  I would argue no, that their relationship is just as viable as any other.  Sex has devolved into something of a perverted pass time in our generation I think.  I mean, yes some sort sexual contact is usually involved in human relationships, even a simple hand hand holding is enough sexual contact for some people.  But, as Adam Liberty so eloquently and aptly put it, some sex, even between loving couples, has been degraded to intervaginal masturbation.  Yes that is an uncomfortable term, but it describes more than its fair share of sexual intercourse.  This implies that some sex is basically just self service between two people, that there is no interest in one another during the act of sex, only self-interest in achieving sexual satisfaction.  Now in a way, that is reciprocation, but this level of reciprocation is just as easy to attain by oneself as with a partner.  In this way, it emphasizes selfish ends which I believe degrades the quality of the relationship.  Certainly people integrate sex as part of their healthy romantic relationship with one another, but it is not necessary.  A sexual aspect of a relationship must be there, like the sexual aspect between friends I discussed earlier, but the act of sex itself is still not necessary.  Sexual attraction is much too strong of a driving force in human nature to disregard it when determining the quality of a relationship. 


Final Words
So, in summary, love is far too complicated to be placed in the realm of emotion like happiness and sadness.  It is also necessary for human life to exist.  Someone without the capacity to love cannot possibly function in a society of any kind.  The immense human capacity for love is our most important feature.  Although other animals may contain the ability to share concern for each other and to love one another, the human capacity for love is a marvel of sorts; it goes above and beyond any species we know of.  I know some cynics may disagree here and say that humans are selfish beings that are only out to get what they need, and you can just keep right on loving your cynicism, but if one steps outside their place as a human and looks at human society and how many millions and billions of social connections there are that have turned in to loving relationships, love for one another is a prominent, fundamental function of the human race.  Without love we would be lost, and without love we would have no one to care for us.  So the next time you are around a group of your good friends, take the time to remind them how much you care for all of them, you never know when someone may be in the need for a little reciprocation.

Moral Background

For one of my classes, I was required to write a paper discussing where I got my morals from and how my ethical background was developed throughout my life.  Thought I might share because...well because I would like to.

My ethical background has been influenced by many contributors across the course of my life.  Some of these different parties seem to contradict each other, and some work rather well together, but they have all assisted in the development of my solidified moral beliefs.  The sources for my ethical inspiration come from many different general areas.  Anywhere from peers to parents, and religion to media, somewhere in the middle of all of these messages arose my current ethical stance.  Some areas have contributed more than others naturally, but the major contributors for me I think may differ from the norm.  However abnormal the development of my ethics has been, I think they have helped me develop into a fully productive, functioning member of society.

                When I think of ethics and where people usually go for ethical information and guidance, I think of people relying on their parents as the main source for this type of information in their lives.  This only makes sense, relying on those who brought you in to this world and who have raised you and taught you how to walk and talk and give nothing but their best to you in order for you to make it in society, to also rely on these people for guidance in making ethical decisions and receiving aid from them in order to determine right from wrong.  My parents have played a large (but not the most important) role in the development of my ethical standing.  My parents have built one of the main supporting pieces of my ethical foundation in that they taught me that causing harm to another human is not correct in any case.  This may not have been their aim, but it is what I have gathered from their anecdotes and lessons I have collected from them over the course of my life.  This remains part of the creed I live by, in that I believe that if one takes care of those around him, then those around him will take care of him in return.  To this day this influences daily decisions I make on whether I should pass up the guy asking for money for food, or whether I should offer to help someone with their homework, or if I offer to clean up the dishes or something else in the house even if it is not required of me.  I also have found that this way of thinking extends far beyond regular day-to-day decisions.  It makes one look at the world in a completely different way.  I now look at the world in awe due to the number of people in it, all of which have their own story, desires, needs, and personalities, and all of which may be equally likely to support each other in times of need if I take a second out of my day to help them in whatever way I can.

                Certainly my parents developed my code of ethics into the humanitarian state it is in today, but the main contributor to my thinking about the world, and the way I dealt with occurrences I did not know how to handle and the thing that planted the seed for my ability to think about the world is most certainly music.  To most, music is simply a pass time, or something to fill a quiet room or dull the piercing awkwardness of a situation, or even in some more developed lovers of music it is a great joy to listen to it and to enjoy it with friends.  To me however, music is more than just a form of media, each and every (be it instrumental or otherwise) song has a message and each can supply the listener with important information about the world.  Each song can move one emotionally or spiritually or even rationally to act on some idea or another, or inspire one to rethink the world they live in and apply a new set of eyes to his life.  My whole-hearted connection with the music I listened to began when I was 12 and 13 years old, when I was branching out from popular songs heard on the radio and really venturing in to the vast world of music.  On my search, I found songs that supplied me with advice, with consolation, with new world views, and each song helped me step outside of myself and look at the world I lived in from another set of eyes.  The ability to do so is absolutely essential to be a functioning member of society I believe, so this was fundamental in my social development.  Music helped me through times of need, and guided me through the uncertain years of high school and beyond.  It supplied me with the capacity to consider how my actions might affect the world, and how the most important aspect of my ethical decisions is their impact on other humans.  To this day music makes me think about and feel the world around me, and this feeling and thought process varies between every song, allowing me multiple view points, which helps me maintain a well-rounded sense of the world.  Music has developed my ability to view the world in multiple ways, has taught me how varied the human race is, how to feel in certain situations, and how to have a spiritual connection to the world, all of which effect my ethical decisions and my moral code.  This is why music has played the largest role in shaping my ethical code.

                Lately, despite some atheistic beliefs in the past, religion has been influencing my ethical background quite heavily.  Not necessarily a certain religion, because all are equally viable, but spirituality in general has acted in shaping my most recent ethical developments.  A general sense of human spirituality has become very important in determining the way I categorize actions and ideas in to right and wrong.  Spirituality in my case fits nicely in with my previous ethical beliefs that assert that the greatest form of ethical behavior does good to fellow humans.  I see spirituality as something that all humans share whether they realize it or not, so this idea becomes central to caring for each other, which I believe most ethical decisions involve some degree of care for another.

                Through this scattered and difficult-to-articulate history of my morality, I have developed a sense of human interconnectedness.  All the major factors, parents, music, and religion, have taught me something about the interconnectedness of humans, and about the fragility of the human race, which has inspired me to care for it.  Therefore, I have deemed actions and ideas that assist in this care for the human race as ethical actions and ideas.  My ethical background has lead me to the realm of humanitarianism, and it is there that I contently remain today.

Music, Movies, Writing, Video Games, Media

For a Blog that is supposed to be based on media of some kind, I figured I might need to explore this realm a little bit; to pick my brain for my own reasoning for writing something like this.  Everyone in our society recognizes the power of media.  And for media in this discussion, it would be beneficial not to tie it to the radical "The media is corrupt and controlling our lives" sense, but rather just a word for the broad spectrum that is artistic expression and relay of information through various means.  I'm addicted to the stuff.  I spend 90% of my day while I am not sleeping, dealing with some form of media be it a book, writing a paper/blog/facebook stuff, or spending some quality time on my favorite video game.  I have immense interest in all forms of media from film to books to music to video games.  I feel as though I should explore each major area that effects my life in its own respect.

First, and perhaps most appropriately, I want to think about and discuss music.  Music rules the lives of many, and improves the lives of nearly everyone on a daily basis.  Whether you are in to country, post-rock, heavy metal, rap, pop, R&B, electronic, whatever the flavor, music shapes your daily life.  I try my hardest to keep a "to each his own" attitude towards music taste.  I still fail at this, as all of us do, when we scrutinize someone for their music taste because a band they like doesn't possess musical talent in our eyes.  So what?  The purpose of music is to entertain the listener.  This can be done in many, many ways.  Typically, the music I listen to helps me transport to another place, another time, my own place that is exactly how I want it to be.  But what if someone else enjoys music that merely provides a good beat to dance to, despite its lyrics?  Because their music is simple, and perhaps lyrically nonsensical, does that mean that it has any less value than music that takes great talent to produce?  I say no.  We need to embrace the fact that people have different tastes in music rather than make it a point of contention; it's what drives the industry in so many different directions.  If we all liked the same kind of music, the music industry would be like a wildly incestuous family, never getting any outside fresh air from a different genre.  Music, in a way, is a nice metaphor for humanity as a whole in this respect.  Forgive my unrealistic hippie moment for a second, but if we learned to work with the differences between us rather than fight over them, our minds could be expanded in ways we never knew possible.  Music puts your thoughts into sound waves, into beautifully sung lyrics, into the most hardcore guitar riffs that pound out anger and power like nothing else on the planet, and works in ways we cannot understand in altering our moods and outlooks.  Anything with this degree of impact is worthy of our full attention and appreciation.

Film is an astounding form of media with incredible ability to dampen or raise our spirits.  I recently subscribed to Netflix, so for the first time in my life I am getting a taste for the unbelievable amount of films out there.  Everything from dark, cerebral comedy to Pixar movies, there is something for everyone.  Film appeals to us visually (duh), but that gives it power that music and books do not.  This allows us to put ourselves in the position of the actors in the movie much more easily--most of the time.  We can actually think about what we would do if we were in the same setting as the actor on screen.  In this way, film provides the same transport that music can, but somewhat more easily.  Films allow us to actually SEE sides of life that may have never been known to us.  Requiem For a Dream for example, provides us with in inside look at life on drugs.  Why is this important?  Why should we want to know what that is like?  Isn't it supposed to be so horrible that we should never hold interest in that kind of life?  It is important for a few reasons.  One is creating a well rounded person out of yourself.  One cannot be well-rounded without experiencing, or at least getting an idea of a side of life which they are uncomfortable in.  Throughout life, we may go through many lifestyle changes that dramatically alter how we act and think.  To be exposed in small doses like this to other types of life is like a vaccine.  You take in little bits of the other types of life in which you are not involved, so if they do come about, you can be prepared.  Also, curiosity is a very healthy thing to feed.  So why not venture down the path of a few drug addicts aided by the brilliant filmography of Requiem For a Dream?  Film gives us insight from all over the world in the form of documentaries.  It exposes places in the world we may have never known existed.  Overall, film makes us think about the human condition.  No type of thinking can be more productive than that which involves contemplating what it is to be human, and what to do with our time. If media can provide a slingshot for this to happen, then it must be recognized as fundamentally important to higher thinking.

To end this train of though on perhaps a particularly bad note, I would like to think about the vices of music/film.  We all know that music especially has been getting increasingly sexual for increasingly lower ages. We also know that films/T.V. has been getting progressively more violent over the course of our lives.  My question concerning music is, should the age at which people are fully immersed in a sexualized world be getting reduced over time?  Is a sexualized culture a bad thing?  When I was a younger kid, I was listening to Red Hot Chili Peppers, The Backstreet Boys, Linkin Park (I know, quite the combination, but it happened).  These are are sexual and explicit yes, but cryptically so.  Now we have Miley Cirus singing about how she likes to move her hips in a music video in which she aims to send every unstable man to prison for pedophilia, instead of the Chili Peppers talking about how they like dirt, which is quite possibly drugs, but at least the message isn't blatant.  Songs on the radio now, which are listened to by nearly every kid getting ready for elementary and middle school in the morning, are talking about how if they ain't got no money, they can take their broke ass home, and how someone is such a sexy bitch, and they can learn all about rides on disco sticks, and how to properly take off a polka-dot bikini, unencrypted.  Does this have an effect on the kids of today?  Is the age of sexual maturation a cultural device?  And is it possible to lower the age at which kids become fully immersed in this sexual world.  Who knows.  I'm saying that media sometimes rides a fine line between acceptable and unfair to kids who shouldn't have to worry about their sexualized bodies yet.

If you made it this far, thank you.  I hope this has stimulated some brain waves, or perhaps raised some of your own questions about this media-filled world we live in.  Enjoy, enjoy, enjoy.  Slann.

Nightwish - Last of the Wilds (Dark Passion Play 2009)

The muse has finally struck again, and time to take a closer look at a song that has grown on me incredibly fast, and has quickly become one of my favorite songs in my collection.  I do tend to have instrumental leanings, and this song by Nightwish from their most recent album Dark Passion Play fits right in to that category.  Now, before you may give this song a try, keep in mind that you should probably be predisposed to enjoying the rock genre with distinctive rock guitar riffs, but also some experimental instrumentation that I will get in to later.

This song, as I said before, should fit right in to the library of any rock music fan.  And by rock I mean actual rock, not Nickleback "lumberjack" rock.  From the beginning, as a listener you might feel a bit confused by the first 30 seconds or so, with the use of a very Celtic sounding electronic instrument of some kind.  This is also accompanied by an interesting choice in thunderstorm sounds, usually reserved for relaxing rain type piano songs that never make it past the lobby of the dentist's office.  But then the old familiar rock guitar, drums, bass, the whole shebang kick in shortly after this moment of uncertainty.  This initial introduction of traditional rock instrumentation gives the listener a feel for the kind of drive this song is going to hold throughout its duration.

The guitar of this song gives it most of its driving rock force.  The main riff, the solos, and the filler riffs all seem to provide the main backbone of this song.  This guitar work is backed by a solid bass line, that sometimes gets lost in the waves of guitar and Celtic instruments.  The only lackluster element to this song is the drum line.  Not to say this detracts from the song in any way, but it seems the least developed part of this song.  It provides a pretty run of the mill upbeat and downbeat pattern without many fills (mind you I am no expert so maybe this is more elaborate than I make it out to be).

When these instruments all combine in this songs powerful "choruses" (if you can have one in an instrumental song), this song becomes undeniably enjoyable for any rock music fan.  The combination of the string instrument sounds with the rest of the rock ensemble provides a very unique and very satisfying sound.  Props to Nightwish for getting experimental here and pulling it off.  Once again, I will highly recommend this song to any fan of rock music out there, at least give it a shot, you never know what kind of instrumental music this may lead you to that you never knew existed.

Vocals: N/A
Drums/Percussion: 65/100
Guitar: 90/100
Bass:  82/100
Lyrics: N/A
Secondary Inst.: 95/100
Overall: 92/100

Muse - Uprising (The Resistance 2009)

For my first entry, I thought it fitting to look at a song I have been listening to quite often lately.  Uprising by Muse is the first song on their newest album The Resistance.  As a whole, this album is a work of musical art.  Some may find Matthew Bellamy's vocals to be unnerving or hard to get used to, but his vocal range is something deserving of much credit, and Uprising is an excellent example of that.

The song starts with a very solid beat that could go any number of directions.  This is accompanied by a very unique sounding keyboard.  Now, I am no music expert, so I won't get in over my head here.  The guitar work by Bellamy here is nothing fancy, but who said you need fancy to be effective.  This is not a fancy song, although it sticks to the "epic" sound and feel of hit Muse songs fans have become used to.  Christopher Wolstenholme's bass in this track is also somewhat simplistic, but once again serves the purpose the song needs it to serve for the right feel.  The beat drummed out by Dominic Howard heard at the beginning of the song keeps pounding and pulsing throughout the duration of this track.  It has almost a military march quality, which is very fitting to the part of the song I am most interested in: the lyrics.

The first line of this song "Paranoia is in bloom" fits the opening of this album very well.  A image of the sort of recent sprouting an overwhelming feeling of paranoia the general public has been fed by superiors and the media is brought to mind.  And much like the song states "They'll try to, push drugs that keep us all dumbed down / And hope that, we will never see the truth around," a speculative person of this day and age may get the feeling that those in some position of power are attempting to keep the general public hidden from any less than honorable activities going on behind closed doors.  This opens up a very complicated vision of Muse as a band.  Are they political?  Are they left leaning? Do they even care?  


I know people seem to steer clear of political music, or songs with political agendas, but some more universal and important ideas can be extracted from seemingly "uneducated leftist rhetoric" as some might say.  In these first few lines, Muse has managed to already bring forth the idea that perhaps we should examine our assumptions in what is true and what is false in all things.  I think they would encourage the individual to hold the same revealing candle up to their lyrics, and judge them how you might, this is a big idea of great importance.  Whether you trust people in power or not, being encouraged to think for yourself and acting on it cannot be harmful.  


The following section goes "Another promise, another seed / Another, packaged lie to keep us trapped in greed / And all the, green belts wrapped around our minds / And endless, red tape to keep the truth confined."  This is a direct comment on the promises and ideas we are fed from those whom we are supposed to trust and the advertisements for things we think we need.  Now this may sound like a comment coming from a very bitter, uneducated, hippy of sorts, but think about it.  Why should we trust what we hear from advertisements?  If you were in the position of a person trying to sell a product (say a teeth whitening product, for example) through advertising, and you could make double the money by saying your product is endorsed by some guy who apparently has his dental license, why wouldn't you?  Morals? Who's to say?  Maybe it really does work, but maybe it doesn't, that's why it is important to keep questioning, because you never know when you are going to be taken advantage of.  Once again, it couldn't hurt.


Back to the music, this launches the song into its very powerful chorus (perhaps not as powerful as the second and third time around, but powerful nonetheless): "They will not force us / They will stop degrading us / They will not control us / We will be victorious."  This chorus took me a few listens to sound as powerful as it is, but this is where Bellamy's vocals really shine.  He slightly exercises his talent of the use of falsetto here.  This helps the chorus be empowered to move its listener to actually care that maybe injustice has been done unto them by their superiors.  Some of the power of the chorus lies in the systematic, poetic, timed delivery of the words.  


And perhaps one of my favorite lines from songs I have been listening to recently comes from the next verse: "Rise up and take the power back / It's time the, fat cats had a heart attack / They know that, their time's coming to an end / We have to, unify and watch our flag ascend."  What an image. The fat cats of big business, or the government, or whatever you want to apply it to having a heart attack from their over-consumption and their greed.  How hackneyed is that idea?  But it is rediscovered with excellent imagery from Muse.  Also the unifying and watching our flag ascend is a powerful image that has some old war hero archetypes connected to it, but brings the image to a modern flag flying of the middle and lower classes.


To sum this up, this song is the perfect way to start off an excellent album.  So many big ideas compressed into one five minute section of musical talent.  I would highly recommend this song to anyone interested in a rock style of music with some electronic influences.  A stomach for political undermining wouldn't hurt either.  The song never gets very raucous or loud, but it has some drive and a solid beat.


Vocals: 88/100
Drums/Percussion: 79/100
Guitar: 76/100
Bass:  75/100
Lyrics: 93/100
Overall: 85/100